Relationship Between Inter-Functional Coordination On Performance Of Universities In Kenya

  • daisy bowen

Abstract

Inter-functional coordination is one of the market orientation components which is based on the the customer and competitor information entailing a business’s coordinated efforts involving not only marketing department, but all the organizations’ departments and resources in order to create superior value for customers.   The main purpose of the study was to analyse the relationship between inter-functional coordination on performance of universities in Kenya.  The philosophical foundation of this study was positivism.   Descriptive and correlation designs design was adopted for the study.  The target population for this study was 63 universities in Kenya.  A total of 115 respondents who include 3 staff and 2 students were selected from a sample of 23 universities.  Both stratified sampling and purposive sampling were used in selecting respondents from the population.  A structured questionnaire, administered through drop and pick was used in collecting data.  Descriptive and inferential statistics were used in analysing data through the multiple linear regression by using of Stata software, SAS System and Statistical Package for Social Sciences.  The relationship between market orientation and university performance were analysed using correlation analysis.  The analysed data was presented in frequency tables, pie charts, graphs and percentages.  The results show that there was a significant positive relationship between inter-functional coordination and university performance at 1% level of significance respectively.  This mean that the independent variable inter-functional coordination was significant in performance of universities.  The study concludes that universities in Kenya were market oriented through inter-functional coordination. Implying that that inter-functional coordination is an important market orientation concept that needs to be adopted and implemented by universities in Kenya.  This study recommends that universities in Kenya should make an effort and focus more on ensuring smooth flow of communication and sharing of information across all the university’s departments.  The university management need to know that their institutions would perform well if they develop inter-functional coordination capabilities that will support competitive behaviour of innovativeness. 

 

Key words:  Market Orientation, Inter-functional Coordination, Performance

 

References

Akonkwa, D. B. M. (2009). “Is Market Orientation a Relevant Strategy for Higher Education

Institutions? Context Analysis and Research agendaâ€, International Journal of Quality

and Service Sciences, 1(3), 311-333.

Blankson, C. and Cheng, J.M.S. (2005). “Have Small Businesses adopted the Market Orientation

concept? The case of Small Businesses in Michiganâ€, Journal of Business and Industrial

Marketing, 20(6), 317-30.

Bankson, C. & Stokes, D. (2002). Marketing practices in the UK Small Business Sector,

Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 20, 49-61.

Canterbury, R. M. (2000). Higher Education Marketing: A Challenge. Journal of Marketing for

Higher Education, Vol. 9 (No, (3)), 15-24.

Carey, S., Lawson, B., & Krause, D. R. (2011). Social capital configuration, legal bonds and

performance in buyer–supplier relationships. Journal of operations management, 29(4),

-288.

Caruana,A., Ramaseshan, B. & Ewing, M. T. (1998). Do universities that are more Market Orientated perform better? International Journal of Public Sector Management, 11(1), 55-

Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests.

Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334.

Chou, Y. K. (2006). Three simple models of social capital and economic growth. The Journal of

Socio-Economics, 35(5), 889–912.

Commission for University Education, (2014). CUE Newsletter. A commission for

University Education Publication.

Dezso, C. L., Grohsjean, T., & Kretschmer, T. (2012). Coordination Experience and Team

Performance: Evidence from the Electronic Games Industry. Robert H. Smith School

Research Paper No. RHS 06-136

Duffy, M., Scott, K., Shaw, J., Tepper, B., & Aquino, K. (2012). A social context model of envy

and social undermining. Academy of Management Journal , 55 (3), 643–666

Freel, M. (2000). External linkages and product innovation in small manufacturing firms.

Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 12(3), 245-266.

Gurkov, I. (2010). Strategy technique for the times of high uncertainty – achieving corporate

robustness through maximization of intrinsic stakeholders’ benefits, in: M. Sheresheva,

ed. Contemporary Management: Problems, Hypotheses, Research. Moscow: HSE

Publishing, 11-16

Hemsley-Brown, J., & Oplatka, I. (2010). Market orientation in universities: A comparative

Study of two national higher education systems. International Journal of Educational

Management, 24(3), 204-220.

Jüttner, U., Christopher, M., & Baker, S. (2007). Demand chain management-integrating

marketing and supply chain management. Industrial marketing management, 36(3), 377

-392.

Kanovska, L., & Tomaskova, E. (2014). Market orientation and strategic behaviour at high-tech

companies. E+M: Ekonomie a Management, 17(4), 86-100.

Kaura, V., Durga Prasad, C. S., & Sharma, S. (2015). Service quality, service convenience, price

and fairness, customer loyalty, and the mediating role of customer satisfaction.

International Journal of Bank Marketing, 33(4), 404-422.

Kohli, A. K., & Jaworski, B. J. (1990). Market orientation: the construct, research propositions,

and managerial implications. Journal of Marketing, 54 (2), 1-18.

Kotler and Fox, (1994) Kotler, P. & Fox, K. (1994). Strategic Marketing for Educational

Institutions, (2nd ed), Prentice Hall, Inc., New Jersey.

Kotler, P. & Keller, KL. (2009). Marketing management, (13th ed), Prentice Hall, Pearson.

International Edition, 59-60.

Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Bell, B. S. (2003). Work groups and teams in organizations. In W. C.

Borman, D. R. Ilgen & R. J. Klimoski (Eds.), Handbook of psychology (Vol. 12):

Industrial and Organizational Psychology (333-375). New York: Wiley-Blackwell.

Kwon, S. W., & Adler, S. P. (2014). Social Capital: Maturation of a field of research. Academy

of Management Review, 4, Vol. 39, No. 4, 412–422

Lado, Nora, Maydeu – Olivars & Rivera, J. (1995). Measuring Market Orientation in several

Populations: A structural equations model. Journal of Marketing. 32(1/2), 23-39.

Lim, C., & Putnam, R. (2010). Religion, social networks and life satisfaction. American

Sociological Review , 75 (6), 914-933

Menguc, B., & Auh, S. (2006). Creating a firm-level dynamic capability through capitalizing on

market orientation and innovativeness. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 34(1), 63-73

Mohr, J. J., Sengupta, S., & Slater, S. (2014). Marketing of High Technology products and

Innovations. England: Pearson Education Limited, 2014. ISBN 9781292040332

Nahapiet, J. & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational

advantage. The Academy of Management Review 23 (2) 242-266

Narver, J. C., & Slater, S. F. (1990). The Effect of a Market Orientation on Business

Profitability.Journal of Marketing, 54 (4), 20-35.

Newman, C. M. (2002) “The Current State of Marketing Activity among Higher Education

Institutionsâ€, Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 12(1), 15-29 and suggestions for further research, Strategic Management Journal, 28(1). 121-146.

Nunnally, J. C. (1968). Psychometric Theory; (1st ed.). McGraw-Hill, New York.

Nunnally, J. C. (1967). Psychometric Theory; McGraw-Hill, New York.

Ogunnaike, O.O.,Akinbode, M. & Onochie, M.P. (2014). An Exploratory Analysis of Market

Orientation and Perceived Corporate Image in Education Marketing: A Study of Selected

Students, European Journal of Business and Management 6(25), 2222-2839.

Oplatka, I., Foskett, N. and Hemsley-Brown, J. (2002) “Educational Marketization and the

Head’s Psychological Well-Being: A Speculative Conceptualizationâ€, British Journal of

Educational Studies, 50(4), 419-441.

Rivera-Camino, J., & Ayala, V. M. B. (2010). Market orientation at Universities. Construct

and Construct and exploratory validation. Innovare, 20(36), 125-138.

Tay, J. Y. W., & Tay, L. (2007). Market orientation and the property development business in

Singapore. International. Journal of Strategic Property Management, 11(1), 1-16.

Tomaskova, E. (2018). Inter-functional Coordination and its Influence on Customer Success

Kaoutar and Bouchra (2013). Rethinking Market Orientation of Universities in Morocco

an Internal Stakeholders Orientation. International Journal of Engineering and

Innovative Technology (IJEIT), 2(10), 1-6.

Tovar, 2016).

Tsiotsou, R. H. (2010). Delineating the effect of market orientation on services performance: a

component-wise approach. The Service Industries Journal, 30(3), 375-403.

Woodside, A.G. (2005). Firm Orientations, Innovativeness, and Business Performance:

advancing a system dynamics view following a comment on Hult, Hurley, and Knight‟s

study, Industrial Marketing Management, 34, 275-9.

Zebal, M. A., & Goodwin, D. R. (2011). Market orientation in developing nation- Antecedents,

consequences and the moderating effect of environmental factors. Marketing Bulletin, 2

(1), 23.

Zhao, Y. & Cavusgil, S. (2006). The Effect of Supplier’s Market Orientation on Manufacturer’s

Trust’. Industrial Marketing Management, 35(4), 405–414.

Zhou, K.Z., Brown, J.R. & Dev, C.S. (2009). Market Orientation, Competitive Advantage, and

Performance: A demand-based perspective`. Journal of Business Research. 62,1063-

Published
2019-12-04
How to Cite
bowen, daisy. (2019). Relationship Between Inter-Functional Coordination On Performance Of Universities In Kenya. Kabarak Journal of Research & Innovation, 8(1), 49-64. Retrieved from http://ojs.kabarak.ac.ke/index.php/journal1/article/view/348